A viral video captures gay men laughing as a surrogate-born baby cries out for ‘mama,’ exposing commercial surrogacy as modern-day human trafficking that shatters traditional family bonds.
Story Highlights
- Daniel Hayworth’s April 17, 2026, Human Events article condemns a viral video of gay men mocking a baby’s natural call for its mother.
- Commercial surrogacy commodifies children and exploits women, equating to slavery under the guise of family formation.
- Europe bans commercial surrogacy, recognizing its ethical violations, while U.S. conservatives increasingly oppose the practice.
- Shared bipartisan concerns highlight government failure to protect vulnerable women and children from elite-driven exploitation.
Viral Video Ignites Ethical Firestorm
Daniel Hayworth published an opinion piece on Human Events on April 17, 2026, spotlighting a viral video of two gay men laughing as their surrogate-born baby repeatedly calls for “mama.” The infant’s distress underscores the child’s innate longing for its biological mother, cruelly denied through commercial surrogacy. Hayworth argues this practice severs natural bonds, prioritizing adult desires over infant welfare. Conservatives view this as a direct assault on foundational family principles.
Commercial Surrogacy as Human Trafficking
Hayworth equates commercial surrogacy to human trafficking and slavery, where babies become commodities bought via contracts. Women, often from vulnerable economic backgrounds, rent their wombs for payment, exploiting their reproductive capacity. This dehumanizes both mother and child, treating human life as a market product. Traditional American values of life, liberty, and family reject such commodification, echoing concerns from both conservatives and growing bipartisan voices.
European nations have banned commercial surrogacy, affirming its incompatibility with human dignity. Recent Chilean legislation proposes criminal penalties, nullifying contracts and protecting children from being traded. These moves signal global recognition that surrogacy confuses parenthood and harms child identity formation. In the U.S., under President Trump’s second term, Republican control offers a chance to curb this practice amid frustrations with elite-driven moral decay.
Conservative Unity Against Exploitation
Right-wing commentators like Matt Walsh label surrogacy a “morally horrific practice” and “deeply evil,” never in the child’s best interest. Critics argue it fuels a post-Roe agenda to safeguard the nuclear family, countering LGBTQ+ expansions that erode traditional structures. Even some liberals share unease over government inaction against industries profiting from women’s exploitation. This convergence reveals deep state priorities favoring powerful interests over everyday Americans’ values.
DANIEL HAYWORTH: Viral video of gay men laughing as baby calls for ‘mama’ shows commercial surrogacy is human trafficking and slavery, not family formation@Dhayworth22 for @HumanEvents ftw with a full throated defense of God's design for lifehttps://t.co/nbNQ0uQa1E
— Libby Emmons (@libbyemmons) April 17, 2026
Surrogacy divides conservatives, with figures like Guy Benson and Dave Rubin facing backlash for using it despite ethical objections applicable to all couples. Opponents stress opposition targets the corrupt industry, not gay families specifically. As frustrations mount across political lines—over woke agendas, immigration, and fiscal mismanagement—banning commercial surrogacy aligns with restoring limited government that protects the vulnerable. Americans demand leaders prioritize hard-working families over elite experiments.
