Poll Results

YES: 89% | NO: 11%

In our America First Survey, we asked:

“Do you believe the U.S. should prioritize America First spending policies?”

This question speaks directly to ongoing national debates about government spending — specifically, whether taxpayer funds should focus on solving domestic issues before being used for foreign aid, international development, or overseas defense efforts.

Here’s how respondents answered:

• Yes: Focus on America First 89%
• No:  Focus on International Policies  11%

Why This Question Matters

The U.S. spends hundreds of billions of dollars annually on foreign assistance, military support for allies, international organizations, and global health programs. In recent years, an “America First” approach has gained popularity — arguing that tax dollars should be directed to domestic priorities like infrastructure, healthcare, education, border security, and veterans’ care before being sent abroad.

The question of how to strike a balance between national interest and global leadership continues to shape political platforms and federal budgets.

Arguments from Those Who Said “Yes – Prioritize America First”

• Fix Home First:
  Many respondents believe it’s time to focus spending on struggling communities at home — from homelessness and healthcare to infrastructure and schools.
• Foreign Aid Fatigue:
  Voters question why the U.S. continues to send billions overseas when domestic issues like inflation, veteran care, and public safety remain unresolved.
• Accountability and Waste:
  Critics argue that much foreign aid is mismanaged or ends up in the hands of corrupt regimes, with little oversight or return on investment for American taxpayers.
• National Sovereignty and Priorities:
  Supporters say that elected officials are first and foremost accountable to American citizens — not to international institutions or foreign governments.
• Public Sentiment Is Shifting:
  Multiple polls and political trends suggest increasing public support for cutting foreign aid in favor of solving pressing problems at home.

Arguments from Those Who Said “No – Maintain Global Commitments”

• Global Stability Benefits the U.S.:
  Supporters of international spending argue that foreign aid and strategic partnerships prevent instability, war, and migration crises — all of which can affect America directly.
• Soft Power and Diplomacy:
  Foreign assistance strengthens U.S. alliances, promotes democracy, and supports trade relationships that benefit the economy long-term.
• Humanitarian Responsibility:
  Some believe the U.S. has a moral obligation as a global leader to assist nations facing famine, conflict, or natural disasters.
• National Security Partnerships:
  Foreign military aid (like to Ukraine or Israel) is often viewed not just as charity, but as a strategic investment in America’s own defense interests.
• It’s Not All or Nothing:
  Opponents of the “America First” model argue that the U.S. can still address domestic needs while maintaining a role in global leadership — it’s about balance, not withdrawal.

Conclusion

According to this poll, a strong majority of respondents support “America First” spending policies, favoring domestic priorities over foreign aid and international commitments. Still, a vocal minority believes that American leadership abroad is essential for long-term national interests.

As fiscal pressures grow and international challenges mount, the debate over where and how to invest American tax dollars is only becoming more urgent.