LEAKED Bohemian Grove Roster Ignites Fury

A leaked Bohemian Grove attendance roster is reigniting a hard question Americans keep asking: who’s really in the room when the powerful gather behind locked gates?

Story Snapshot

An independent journalist, Daniel Boguslaw, published what he described as the 2023 Bohemian Grove encampment attendance list, reportedly topping 2,200 names.
At least one Bohemian Club member reportedly authenticated the list to media, while the club also claimed it does not maintain member lists.
The roster-style leak spotlights elite cross-networking across politics, finance, tech, media, and entertainment—fueling new public distrust.
Coverage circulated widely in early 2026 through alternative outlets citing reporting tied to the New York Post and San Francisco Standard.

What the Leak Claims to Show About Bohemian Grove

Daniel Boguslaw published a document described as the 2023 attendance list for the Bohemian Grove summer encampment, an annual retreat hosted by the all-male Bohemian Club in Sonoma County, California. Reports describe more than 2,200 names organized by the club’s internal “camps,” a structure that functions like private fraternities inside the retreat. At least one club member reportedly confirmed the roster’s authenticity to media outlets that later amplified the story.

Reports also underline a key distinction: the list is framed as an attendance roster for a single year, not a definitive lifetime “membership list.” That difference matters because it limits what can be proven from the document alone. Even so, the leak has traction because it offers something previous controversies often lacked—names and organizational structure rather than just rumor, secondhand claims, or sensational imagery.

Bohemian Club History, Secrecy, and Why It Draws Suspicion

The Bohemian Club dates back to 1872 and operates both a private clubhouse in San Francisco and a roughly 2,700-acre redwood campground known as Bohemian Grove. The encampment is known for arts programming, performances, and a signature “Cremation of Care” ritual staged near a large owl statue. The club’s motto, “Weaving Spiders Come Not Here,” is commonly described as a warning against overt business dealing inside the retreat.

Public skepticism intensified after Alex Jones’ 2000 infiltration and later documentary coverage that brought the ritual into the public eye. Historical references to elite discomfort also persist; reporting has noted that Richard Nixon privately derided the event decades ago. The new leak differs from earlier cultural flashpoints because it centers on an alleged documented roster. That shifts debate from “Did something happen?” to “Who attended, and why so private?”

Who Appears on the List and Why That Matters

Stories describing the roster say it includes major names spanning government, business, technology, and entertainment. Reported political and institutional figures include Henry Kissinger, James A. Baker III, Edwin Meese III, Paul F. Pelosi, Edwin Feulner, Bobby Inman, and judge Carlos Bea. Business figures reportedly named include Charles G. Koch, Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller Jr., David Rubenstein, Harlan Crow, Riley Bechtel, and members of the Fisher family.

Technology and finance names highlighted in coverage include former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and venture capital figures such as Brook H. Byers and Tim Draper. Entertainment names cited include Conan O’Brien and Clint Eastwood, with Jimmy Buffett also mentioned in the reporting. The bipartisan and cross-industry mix is the point: it undercuts simplistic “left vs. right” narratives while reinforcing a more troubling reality for everyday voters—elite social ecosystems can persist regardless of election outcomes.

Verification Limits and Competing Claims About the Document

Coverage says the list was authenticated by at least one Bohemian Club member, but there is no public indication of a comprehensive independent audit verifying each of the thousands of names. The Bohemian Club also reportedly stated it does not maintain lists of its members, a phrasing that can be read narrowly. A club could deny “membership lists” while a separate attendance roster or camp roster still exists for logistical purposes.

That gap leaves readers with two simultaneous truths: the leak has at least some reported confirmation, and the full scope remains hard to prove from the outside. Conservative readers are right to demand clarity, because secrecy paired with elite power inevitably breeds distrust. Still, the available reporting does not establish that any specific illegal conduct occurred; it primarily documents who allegedly attended and how insulated the gathering is.

Why the Leak Lands Differently in 2026

In a post-Biden political environment, many Americans are already primed to question institutions that pushed top-down cultural agendas, overspending, and soft enforcement on the border. The Bohemian Grove story plugs into that broader frustration, not because it proves a “shadow government,” but because it highlights how insulated elite networks can look to citizens paying the inflation bill and watching Washington’s revolving-door culture continue.

Bohemian Grove Membership List Leaked https://t.co/Dzfgiim5db

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) February 27, 2026

The immediate impact appears reputational: more scrutiny, more online sleuthing, and more pressure for transparency. Longer term, the leak could harden public demands that powerful figures—whether donors, executives, or former officials—stop hiding behind exclusivity when their decisions shape the national life of working families. For constitutionalists, the core concern is simple: self-government requires trust, and trust requires sunlight.