Trump’s “Terrorist” Tag Backfires — Shocking Video Revealed

Video evidence disputes the Trump administration’s “domestic terrorist” label on Alex Pretti, igniting constitutional concerns.

Story Highlights

Alex Pretti, a VA nurse, was shot by a Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis.
Trump administration labeled him a “domestic terrorist,” despite contradicting video evidence.
Outrage ensues as federal agents increase presence in Minneapolis under “Metro Surge.”
Debate rises over federal overreach and constitutional rights amidst calls for an independent investigation.

Federal Characterization Under Scrutiny

The Trump administration’s decision to label Alex Pretti as a “domestic terrorist” has sparked significant controversy. Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, was shot by a Border Patrol agent during an ICE operation in Minneapolis on January 24, 2026. Despite video evidence and witness accounts showing Pretti intervening non-violently, the administration’s initial narrative painted him as a threat to law enforcement, intensifying debates over federal overreach.

The administration’s narrative quickly unraveled as video footage circulated, showing Pretti with his phone raised, arms up, before being shot. This incident, part of the broader “Metro Surge” operation deploying 2,000 agents to Minneapolis, has drawn criticism for targeting areas with significant Somali-American populations. The characterization of Pretti as a terrorist has raised alarms about constitutional rights and the potential misuse of federal power.

Political and Social Fallout

The shooting of Alex Pretti has galvanized both local and national political figures. Minnesota’s Democratic Governor Tim Walz has called for the withdrawal of federal troops, criticizing the heavy-handed approach as a political maneuver. Meanwhile, Senator Amy Klobuchar highlighted the stark contrast between the administration’s statements and the video evidence, insisting on accountability.

The incident has prompted calls from both Democrats and some Republicans for an independent investigation. Congressional Democrats, in particular, have threatened to block funding for the Department of Homeland Security until restrictions on ICE operations are imposed. This bipartisan concern underscores the growing unease with the administration’s aggressive policies.

Implications for Federal Policies

In the wake of this incident, the Trump administration faces mounting pressure as public perception shifts. The backlash could serve as a turning point in the debate over immigration enforcement and federal authority. The administration’s threat to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act reflects a significant escalation, but analysts caution that such measures may further alienate the public.

As Minneapolis residents continue to grapple with increased federal presence, the incident highlights the delicate balance between national security and constitutional rights. The administration’s response in the coming weeks will be critical in shaping the future of immigration enforcement and civil liberties in America.