Obama-Era Plot EXPOSED: Trump Was Targeted!

Without a shred of evidence, mainstream media outlets like CBS and NBC continue to peddle the debunked narrative that Russia helped Trump win in 2016, while dismissing explosive new revelations pointing to a calculated campaign against him.

At a Glance

Declassified documents suggest an Obama-era plot against Trump.
The DOJ has formed a “strike force” to investigate these claims.
CBS and NBC criticize the new allegations, maintaining a focus on Russia.
Public trust in intelligence agencies is at risk amid ongoing scrutiny.

Unraveling the Alleged Plot Against Trump

In July 2025, Tulsi Gabbard, now Director of National Intelligence, released declassified documents accusing the Obama administration of orchestrating a campaign to delegitimize President Trump’s 2016 victory. This bombshell revelation suggests that senior intelligence officials may have manipulated intelligence to create the illusion of Russian collusion—a narrative that has long been discredited yet stubbornly persists in mainstream media circles.

‘Without Evidence’; CBS, NBC Slam Gabbard, Still Insist Russia Helped Trump Win in 2016 https://t.co/VMMpeecsFv

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) July 24, 2025

The documents claim that prior to the election, the Intelligence Community concluded Russia was unlikely to use cyber means to influence the outcome. Post-election, however, the Obama administration allegedly directed a new intelligence assessment to justify their narrative of interference. This has reignited fierce debate, with CBS and NBC quick to dismiss the revelations as mere distractions, ignoring the potential consequences of such politically motivated actions.

The DOJ Steps In

On July 24, 2025, the Department of Justice announced the formation of a “strike force” to delve into the allegations brought forward by Gabbard. This move underscores the seriousness of the claims, which, if proven true, could expose a significant abuse of power and a betrayal of public trust. The DOJ’s involvement signifies a critical step towards accountability and transparency within our intelligence agencies.

As the investigation unfolds, it’s imperative to understand the stakes. Former Obama administration officials like James Clapper and John Brennan, alongside others, find themselves at the center of this controversy, facing potential legal repercussions if these allegations hold water. The investigation’s outcomes could reshape the discourse surrounding the legitimacy of intelligence practices and the politicization of national security.

Media Bias and Public Perception

The media’s role in shaping public perception cannot be overstated. CBS and NBC’s skepticism towards the new revelations highlights a troubling trend within mainstream media to cling to outdated narratives, despite mounting evidence to the contrary. While these outlets continue to focus on the Epstein files and other sensationalist stories, they dismiss the possibility of a coordinated effort to undermine a sitting president.

This biased coverage only deepens the divide among Americans, further polarizing a nation already weary of partisan politics. It is crucial for citizens to critically evaluate media narratives and demand accountability from those in power, ensuring that truth prevails over political agendas.

Implications for the Future

The implications of this controversy are far-reaching. In the short term, it exacerbates political tensions and places intense scrutiny on intelligence practices. Should the allegations be substantiated, we could witness a significant erosion of trust in our intelligence agencies, leading to sweeping reforms and increased oversight.

Long-term, the stakes are even higher. The precedent set by this controversy could pave the way for further politicization of intelligence, threatening the very integrity of our democratic processes. As the investigation progresses, it is essential that we remain vigilant, demanding transparency and accountability to safeguard the future of our nation.