A new peace plan by President Trump aims to end the Gaza war, but does it threaten to shift US priorities away from core constitutional values?
Story Highlights
- Trump’s 20-point Gaza Peace Plan proposes deradicalization and redevelopment.
- The plan includes an Arab-led International Stabilization Force to replace IDF security.
- Hamas is expected to disarm and release hostages, a key sticking point.
- Trump and Netanyahu emphasize “eternal peace” but threaten escalation if rejected.
Trump’s 20-Point Peace Plan for Gaza
On September 29, 2025, President Donald Trump unveiled a bold 20-point initiative aimed at resolving the ongoing conflict in Gaza. This plan, which builds on aspects of his previous 2020 Israel-Palestine peace efforts, focuses on transforming Gaza into a terror-free zone through deradicalization and redevelopment. A major component involves the establishment of an Arab-led International Stabilization Force (ISF) to take over security from the IDF.
Trump, alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, presented the plan as a pathway to “eternal peace,” offering a mix of humanitarian aid, economic incentives, and governance restructuring. However, the plan also threatens escalation if Hamas rejects the terms, particularly the demands for disarmament and hostage release.
Challenges Facing the Peace Plan
Despite its ambitious goals, the plan faces significant hurdles. Hamas’s disarmament and their release of hostages are critical yet contentious issues. The plan proposes a temporary technocratic governance structure chaired by Trump, which aims to transition Gaza toward self-governance. However, Hamas has historically opposed such conditions, complicating the plan’s viability.
Another challenge lies in the logistics of implementing the International Stabilization Force. Although supported by Arab neighbors, the transition of security control from the IDF to this new force raises concerns about sovereignty and the potential for regional instability.
Implications for US Foreign Policy
Trump’s initiative underscores a significant shift in US foreign policy, emphasizing a more hands-on approach in Middle Eastern affairs. By prioritizing this Gaza peace effort, the administration signals a departure from previous strategies, potentially diverting attention from other critical areas like illegal immigration and domestic economic issues.
For conservatives, the concern remains whether this plan inadvertently compromises America’s focus on core constitutional values. The emphasis on international stabilization and foreign engagement poses questions about the balance between global responsibilities and national interests.
Sources:
Guide to Trump’s Twenty-Point Gaza Peace Deal
2020 Israel–Palestine Peace Plan









